Passive Assessment of Geophysical Instruments Performance using Electrical Network Frequency Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26443/seismica.v2i2.1082Keywords:
seismology, eletrical network frequency, instrumentation, quality control, timing errorsAbstract
The electrical network frequency (ENF) of the alternating current operated on the power grid is a well-known source of noise in digital recordings. The noise is widespread and appears not just in close proximity to high-voltage power lines, but also in instruments simply connected to the mains powers grid. This omnipresent, anthropogenic signal is generally perceived as a nuisance in the processing of geophysical data. Research has therefore been mainly focused on its elimination from data, while its benefits have gone largely unexplored. It is shown that mHz fluctuations in the nominal ENF (50-60 Hz) induced by variations in power usage can be accurately extracted from geophysical data. This information represents a persistent time-calibration signal that is coherent between instruments over national scales. Cross-correlation of reliable reference ENF data published by electrical grid operators with estimated ENF data from geophysical recordings allows timing errors to be resolved at the 1 s level. Furthermore, it is shown that a polarization analysis of particle motion at the ENF can detect instrument orientation anomalies. While the source of the ENF signal in geophysical data appears instrument and site specific, its general utility in the detection of timing and orientation anomalies is presented.
References
Ahern, T., Benson, R., Casey, R., Trabant, C., & Weertman, B. (2015). Improvements in Data Quality, Integration and Reliability: New Developments at the IRIS DMC. Advances in Geosciences, 40, 31–35. https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-40-31-2015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-40-31-2015
Beyreuther, M., Barsch, R., Krischer, L., Megies, T., Behr, Y., & Wassermann, J. (2010). ObsPy: A Python toolbox for seismology [Software]. Seismological Research Letters, 81(3), 530–533. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.81.3.530 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.81.3.530
Bormann, P., & Wielandt, E. (2013). Seismic signals and noise. In New Manual of Seismological Observatory Practice 2 (NMSOP2) (pp. 1–62). Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ. https://doi.org/10.2312/GFZ.NMSOP-2_ch4
Butler, K. E., & Russell, R. D. (1993). Subtraction of powerline harmonics from geophysical records. Geophysics, 58(6), 898–903. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443474 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443474
Butler, K. E., & Russell, R. D. (2003). Cancellation of multiple harmonic noise series in geophysical records. Geophysics, 68(3), 1083–1090. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1581080 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1581080
Caswell, T. A., Droettboom, M., Lee, A., Hunter, J., Firing, E., Stansby, D., Klymak, J., Hoffmann, T., de Andrade, E. S., Varoquaux, N., Nielsen, J. H., Root, B., Elson, P., May, R., Dale, D., Lee, J.-J., Seppänen, J. K., McDougall, D., Straw, A., … Katins, J. (2020). matplotlib/matplotlib: REL: v3.2.1 (v3.2.1) [Software]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3714460
Cohen, M. B., Said, R., & Inan, U. (2010). Mitigation of 50–60 Hz power line interference in geophysical data. Radio Science, 45(6), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010RS004420 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2010RS004420
Cooper, A. H. (2008). The electric network frequency (ENF) as an aid to authenticating forensic digital audio recordings – an automated approach. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society.
Cooper, A. J. (2010). An automated approach to the Electric Network Frequency (ENF) criterion - Theory and practice. International Journal of Speech Language and the Law, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.v16i2.193 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.v16i2.193
Coyne, J., Bobrov, D., Bormann, P., Duran, E., Grenard, P., Haralabus, G., Kitov, I., & Starovoit, Y. (2012). CTBTO: Goals, networks, data analysis and data availability. In New manual of seismological observatory practice 2 (NMSOP-2) (pp. 1–41). Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ. https://doi.org/10.2312/GFZ.NMSOP-2_ch15
Evers, L. G., Ceranna, L., Haak, H. W., Pichon, A. L., & Whitaker, R. W. (2007). A seismoacoustic analysis of the gas-pipeline explosion near Ghislenghien in Belgium. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 97(2), 417–425. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120060061 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120060061
Forbriger, T. (2007). Reducing magnetic field induced noise in broad-band seismic recordings. Geophysical Journal International, 169(1), 240–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03295.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03295.x
Gange, M. (2011). Low-frequency and tonal characteristics of Transformer noise. Proceedings of Acoustics.
Garg, R., Varna, A. L., & Wu, M. (2012). Modeling and analysis of electric network frequency signal for timestamp verification. 2012 IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (WIFS), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1109/WIFS.2012.6412627 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/WIFS.2012.6412627
Garg, R., Varna, A. L., & Wu, M. (2011). “Seeing” ENF: Natural time stamp for digital video via optical sensing and signal processing. Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/2072298.2072303 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2072298.2072303
Gorjão, L. R., Jumar, R., Maass, H., Hagenmeyer, V., Yalcin, G. C., Kruse, J., Timme, M., Beck, C., Witthaut, D., & Schäfer, B. (2020). Open database analysis of scaling and spatio-temporal properties of power grid frequencies. Nature Communications, 11(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19732-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19732-7
Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., Gommers, R., Virtanen, P., Cournapeau, D., Wieser, E., Taylor, J., Berg, S., Smith, N. J., Kern, R., Picus, M., Hoyer, S., van Kerkwijk, M. H., Brett, M., Haldane, A., del Río, J. F., Wiebe, M., Peterson, P., … Oliphant, T. E. (2020). Array programming with NumPy [Software]. Nature, 585(7825), 357–362. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2
Hunter, J. D. (2007). Matplotlib: a 2D graphics environment [Software]. Computing in Science & Engineering, 9(3), 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.55
Imanishi, Y., Nawa, K., Tamura, Y., & Ikeda, H. (2022). Effects of vertical nonlinearity on the superconducting gravimeter CT# 036 at Ishigakijima, Japan. Earth, Planets and Space, 74(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-022-01609-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-022-01609-2
Jurkevics, A. (1988). Polarization analysis of three-component array data. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 78(5), 1725–1743. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0780051725
Kennett, B., & Engdahl, E. (1991). Traveltimes for global earthquake location and phase identification. Geophysical Journal International, 105(2), 429–465. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1991.tb06724.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1991.tb06724.x
Klun, M., Zupan, D., Lopatič, J., & Kryžanowski, A. (2019). On the Application of Laser Vibrometry to Perform Structural Health Monitoring in Non-Stationary Conditions of a Hydropower Dam. Sensors, 19(17), 3811. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19173811 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s19173811
KNMI. (1993). Netherlands Seismic and Acoustic Network [Dataset]. Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI), Other/Seismic Network. https://doi.org/10.21944/e970fd34-23b9-3411-b366-e4f72877d2c5
Koymans, M., Domingo Ballesta, J., Ruigrok, E., Sleeman, R., Trani, L., & Evers, L. (2021). Performance assessment of geophysical instrumentation through the automated analysis of power spectral density estimates. Earth and Space Science, 8(9), e2021EA001675. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EA001675 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EA001675
Křen, P., Pálinkáš, V., Val’ko, M., & Mašika, P. (2021). Improved measurement model for FG5/X gravimeters. Measurement, 171, 108739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108739 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108739
Lampert, T. A., & O’Keefe, S. E. (2010). A survey of spectrogram track detection algorithms. Applied Acoustics, 71(2), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2009.08.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2009.08.007
Levkov, C., Mihov, G., Ivanov, R., Daskalov, I., Christov, I., & Dotsinsky, I. (2005). Removal of power-line interference from the ECG: a review of the subtraction procedure. BioMedical Engineering OnLine, 4(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-4-50 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-4-50
Loeb, L. B. (1965). Electrical coronas, their basic physical mechanisms. Univ of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520326538
McNamara, D., & Boaz, R. (2006). PQLX: A software tool to evaluate seismic station performance. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts.
OpenStreetMap contributors. (2017). Planet dump retrieved from https://planet.osm.org. https://www.openstreetmap.org .
Pedersen, H. A., Leroy, N., Zigone, D., Vallée, M., Ringler, A. T., & Wilson, D. C. (2020). Using Component Ratios to Detect Metadata and Instrument Problems of Seismic Stations: Examples from 18 Yr of GEOSCOPE Data. Seismological Research Letters, 91(1), 272–286. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220190180 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0220190180
Petersen, G. M., Cesca, S., & and, M. K. (2019). Automated Quality Control for Large Seismic Networks: Implementation and Application to the AlpArray Seismic Network. Seismological Research Letters, 90(3), 1177–1190. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180342 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180342
Raspberry Shake, S.A. (2016). Raspberry Shake. International Federation of Digital Seismograph Networks. https://doi.org/10.7914/SN/AM
Ringler, A. T., Hagerty, M., Holland, J., Gonzales, A., Gee, L. S., Edwards, J., Wilson, D., & Baker, A. (2015). The data quality analyzer: A quality control program for seismic data. Computers & Geosciences, 76, 96–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2014.12.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2014.12.006
Schippkus, S., Garden, M., & Bokelmann, G. (2020). Characteristics of the Ambient Seismic Field on a Large-N Seismic Array in the Vienna Basin. Seismological Research Letters, 91(5), 2803–2816. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220200153 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0220200153
Shahar Shani-Kadmiel, Frank Linde, Läslo Evers, & Bjorn Vink. (2020). Einstein Telescope Seismic Campaigns [Dataset]. Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI). https://doi.org/10.7914/SN/3T_2020
Trani, L., Koymans, M., Atkinson, M., Sleeman, R., & Filgueira, R. (2017). WFCatalog: A catalogue for seismological waveform data. Computers & Geosciences, 106, 101–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2017.06.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2017.06.008
Uieda, L., Tian, D., Leong, W., Toney, L., Schlitzer, W., Grund, M., Newton, D., Ziebarth, M., Jones, M., & Wessel, P. (2021). PyGMT: A Python interface for the Generic Mapping Tools [Software]. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7772533
Van Rossum, G., & Drake, F. L. (2009). Python 3 Reference Manual. CreateSpace.
Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., Haberland, M., Reddy, T., Cournapeau, D., Burovski, E., Peterson, P., Weckesser, W., Bright, J., van der Walt, S. J., Brett, M., Wilson, J., Millman, K. J., Mayorov, N., Nelson, A. R. J., Jones, E., Kern, R., Larson, E., … SciPy 1.0 Contributors. (2020). SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python. Nature Methods, 17, 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-020-0772-5
Wessel, P., Luis, J. F., Uieda, L., Scharroo, R., Wobbe, F., Smith, W. H. F., & Tian, D. (2019a). The Generic Mapping Tools version 6 (6.0.0) [Software]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3407866
Wessel, P., Luis, J., Uieda, L., Scharroo, R., Wobbe, F., Smith, W. H., & Tian, D. (2019b). The Generic Mapping Tools version 6 [Software]. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 20(11), 5556–5564. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GC008515 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GC008515
Xia, J., & Miller, R. D. (2000). Design of a hum filter for suppressing power-line noise in seismic data. Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics, 5(2), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.4133/JEEG5.2.31 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4133/JEEG5.2.31
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Mathijs Koymans, Jelle Assink, Elske de Zeeuw-van Dalfsen, Läslo Evers
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
