Exploring the Effect of Minimum Magnitude on California Seismic Hazard Maps
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26443/seismica.v2i1.212Abstract
A recent topic of interest is the performance of probabilistic seismic hazard maps relative to historical shaking datasets. Maps developed for different countries appear to overpredict shaking relative to historical shaking datasets. To explore whether this discrepancy arises because of incompleteness in historical datasets, we consider maps and historical data from California. Current probabilistic seismic hazard maps for California appear to predict stronger short period shaking than historical maxima captured by the California Historical Intensity Mapping Project (CHIMP) dataset between 1857 and 2019. We estimate that CHIMP has a magnitude completeness between M 6-6.6, whereas California hazard maps assume a minimum magnitude (MMin) of 5. Disaggregating the maps shows that earthquakes smaller than M 6 and 6.6 respectfully contribute about 25% and 45% of the hazard across California. Increasing the hazard map's MMin to 6 and 6.6 respectively reduces the discrepancy between predicted and observed shaking by approximately 10-20% and 30-35%. These reductions are not enough to bring the maps and data in alignment. Thus, MMin inconsistencies contribute to, but are not the sole cause of, the discrepancy between predicted and historically observed shaking. These results may be generally applicable to maps elsewhere, although MMin will vary for different historical datasets.
References
Albarello, D., & D’Amico, V. (2008). Testing probabilistic seismic hazard estimates by comparison with observations: An example in Italy. Geophysical Journal International, 175(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2008.03928.x
Allen, T. I., Ghasemi, H., & Griffin, J. D. (2023). Exploring Australian hazard map exceedance using an Atlas of historical ShakeMaps. Earthquake Spectra. https://doi.org/10.1177/87552930231151977
Bazzurro, P., & Cornell, A. (1999). Disaggregation of seismic hazard. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 89(2). https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0890020501
Brooks, E. M., Neely, J., Stein, S., Spencer, B. D., & Salditch, L. (2019). Assessments of the performance of the 2017 one-year seismic hazard forecast for the Central and Eastern United States via simulated earthquake shaking data. Seismological Research Letters, 90(3). https://doi.org/10.1785/0220190007
Brooks, E., Stein, S., & Spencer, B. (2017). Investigating the effects of smoothing on the performance of earthquake hazard maps. International Journal of Earthquake and Impact Engineering, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEIE.2017.10010009
Brooks, E., Stein, S., & Spencer, B. D. (2016). Comparing the performance of Japan’s earthquake hazard maps to uniform and randomized maps. Seismological Research Letters, 87(1). https://doi.org/10.1785/0220150100
Brooks, E., Stein, S., Spencer, B. D., Salditch, L., Petersen, M. D., & D.E, M. (2018). Assessing earthquake hazard map performance for natural and induced seismicity in the central and eastern United States. Seismological Research Letters, 89(1). https://doi.org/10.1785/0220170124
Cornell, A. (1968). Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 58(5). https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0580051583
Drouet, S., Ameri, G., Le Dortz, K., Secanell, R., & Senfaute, G. (2020). A probabilistic seismic hazard map for metropolitan France. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00790-7
Einstein, A., & Rosen, N. (1935). The particle problem in the general theory of relativity. Physica Review, 48(1). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.48.73
Field, E. (2008). Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis: A primer. https://opensha.org/resources/PSHA_Primer_v2_0.pdf
Fujiwara, H., Morikawa, N., Ishikawa, Y., Okumura, T., & J, M. (2009). Statistical comparison of national probabilistic seismic hazard maps and frequency of recorded JMA seismic intensities from the K-NET strong-motion observation network in Japan during 1997-2006. Seismological Research Letters, 80(3). https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.80.3.458
Gallahue, M. M., & Abrahamson, N. (2023). New Methodology for Unbiased Ground-Motion Intensity Conversion Equations (GMICE. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120220224
Gallahue, M. M., Salditch, L., Lucas, M. C., Neely, J., Stein, S., Abrahamson, N., Williams, T., & Hough, S. E. (2022). A study on the effect of site response on California seismic hazard map assessment. Frontiers in Earth Science, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.931340
Gneiting, T., & Katzfuss, M. (2014). Probabilistic forecasting. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 1. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-statistics-062713-085831
Griffin, J., Nguyen, N., Cummins, P., & Cipta, A. (2019). Historical earthquakes of the eastern Sunda arc: Source mechanisms and intensity‐based testing of Indonesia’s National Seismic Hazard Assessment. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 109(1. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120180085
Gutenberg, B., & Richter, C. F. (1944). Frequency of earthquakes in California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 34(4). https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0340040185
Hough, S. E. (2013). Spatial variability of “Did You Feel It?” intensity data: Insights into sampling biases in historical earthquake intensity distributions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 103(5). https://doi.org/10.1785/0120120285
Hough, S. E., & Page, M. (2011). Toward a consistent model for strain accrual and release for the New Madrid Seismic Zone, central United States. Journal of Geophysical Research, 116, B03311. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JB007783
Mak, S., Clements, R. A., & Schorlemmer, D. (2014). The statistical power of testing probabilistic seismic-hazard assessments. Seismological Research Letters, 85(4). https://doi.org/10.1785/0220140012
Mak, S., & Schorlemmer, D. (2016a). A comparison between the forecast by the U.S. National Seismic Hazard Maps with recent ground-motion records. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 106(4). https://doi.org/10.1785/0120150323
Mak, S., & Schorlemmer, D. (2016b). What makes people respond to “Did You Feel It?” Seismological Research Letters, 87(1). https://doi.org/DOI:10.1785.0220150056
Marzocchi, W., & Jordan, T. H. (2014). Testing for ontological errors in probabilistic forecasting models of natural systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 111(33). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1410183111
Mignan, A., & Woessner, J. (2012). Estimating the magnitude of completeness for earthquake catalogs, Community Online Resource for Statistical Seismicity Analysis, 45. https://doi.org/10.5078/corssa-00180805
Minson, S. E., Baltay, A. S., Cochran, E. S., McBride, S. K., & Milner, K. R. (2009). Shaking is almost always a surprise: The earthquakes that produce significant ground motion. Seismological Research Letters, 92(1). https://doi.org/10.1785/0220200165
Miyazawa, M., & Mori, J. (2009). Test of seismic hazard map from 500 years of recorded intensity data in Japan. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 99(6). https://doi.org/10.1785/0120080262
Nekrasova, A., Kossobokov, V., Peresanand, A., & Magrin, A. (2014). Comparison of NDSHA, PSHA seismic hazard maps and real seismicity for the Italian territory. Natural Hazards, 70(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0832-6
Page, M., & Felzer, K. (2015). Southern San Andreas fault seismicity is consistent with the Gutenberg-Richter magnitude-frequency distribution. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 105(4). https://doi.org/10.1785/0120140340
Petersen, M. D., Moschetti, M. P., Powers, P. M., Mueller, C. S., Haller, K. M., Frankel, A. D., Zeng, Y., Rezaeian, S., Harmsen, S. C., Boyd, O. S., & Field, N. (2015). The 2014 United States National Seismic Hazard Model. Earthquake Spectra, 31(1. https://doi.org/10.1193/120814EQS210M
Petersen, M. D., Shumway, A. M., Powers, P. M., Mueller, C. S., Moschetti, M. P., Frankel, A. D., Rezaeian, S., McNamara, D. E., Luco, N., Boyd, O. S., Rukstales, K. S., Jaiswal, K. S., Thompson, E. M., Hoover, S. M., Clayton, B. S., Field, E. H., & Zeng, Y. (2020). The 2018 update of the US National Seismic Hazard Model: Overview of model and implications. Earthquake Spectra, 36(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293019878199
Petersen, M. D., Shumway, A. M., Powers, P. M., Mueller, C. S., Moschetti, M. P., Frankel, A. D., Rezaeian, S., McNamara, D. E., Luco, N., Boyd, O. S., Rukstales, K. S., Jaiswal, K. S., Thompson, E. M., Hoover, S. M., Clayton, B. S., Field, E. H., & Zeng, Y. (2021). The 2018 update of the US National Seismic Hazard Model: Where, why, and how much probabilistic ground motion maps changed. Earthquake Spectra, 37(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293020988016
Rey, J., Beauval, C., & Douglas, J. (2018). Do French macroseismic intensity observations agree with expectations from the European Seismic Hazard Model 2013? Journal of Seismology, 22(3. https://doi.org/10.1007/210950-017-9724-7
Rukstales, K. S., & Petersen, M. D. (2019). Data release for 2018 update of the U.S. National Seismic Hazard Model, U.S. Geological Survey Data Release. https://doi.org/10.5066/P9WT5OVB
Salditch, L., Gallahue, M. M., Lucas, M. C., Neely, J. S., Hough, S. E., & Stein, S. (2020). California Historical Intensity Mapping Project (CHIMP): A consistently reinterpreted dataset of seismic intensities for the past 162 yr and implications for seismic hazard maps. Seismological Research Letters, 91(5). https://doi.org/10.1785/0220200065
Salditch, L., Hough, S. E., Stein, S., Spencer, B. D., Brooks, E. M., Neely, J. S., & Lucas, M. C. (2018). The 1952 Kern County, California earthquake: A case study of issues in the analysis of historical intensity data for estimation of source parameters. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors. In, 283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2018.08.007
Salditch, L. M. (2021). Investigating Earthquake Recurrence and Hazard Models [Doctorate dissertation. Northwestern University. https://doi.org/10.21985/n2-my3w-v278
Shumway, A. M. (2019). Data release for the 2014 National Seismic Hazard Model for the conterminous U.S., U.S. Geological Survey Data Release. https://doi.org/10.5066/P9P77LGZ
Stein, S., Spencer, B. D., & Brooks, E. M. (2015). Metrics for assessing earthquake hazard map performance. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 105(4). https://doi.org/10.1785/0120140164
Stirling, M., & Gerstenberger, M. (2010). Ground motion-based testing of seismic hazard models in New Zealand. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 100(4). https://doi.org/10.1785/0120090336
Stirling, M. W., & Petersen, M. (2006). Comparison of the historical record of earthquake hazard with seismic-hazard models for New Zealand and the continental United States. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 96(6). https://doi.org/10.1785/0120050176
Tasan, H., Beauval, C., Helmstetter, A., Sandikkaya, A., & Guéguen, P. (2014). Testing probabilistic seismic hazard estimates against accelerometric data in two countries: France and Turkey. Geophysical Journal International, 198(3). https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggu191
Vanneste, K., Stein, S., Camelbeeck, T., & Vleminckx, B. (2018). Insights into earthquake hazard maps performance from shaking history simulations. Scientific Reports, 8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20214-6
Wang, Z. (2015). Predicting or forecasting earthquakes and the resulting ground motion hazards: A dilemma for earth scientists. Seismological Research Letters, 86(1). https://doi.org/10.1785/0220140211
Ward, S. N. (1995). Area-based tests of long-term seismic hazard predictions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 85(5). https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0850051285
Wood, H. O., & Neumann, F. (1931). Modified Mercalli Intensity scale of 1931. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0210040277
Worden, C. B., Gerstenberger, M. C., Rhoades, D. A., & Wald, D. J. (2012). Probabilistic relationships between ground-motion parameters and modified Mercalli intensity in California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 102(1). https://doi.org/10.1785/0120110156
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Molly Gallahue, Leah Salditch, Madeleine Lucas, James Neely, Seth Stein, Norman Abrahamson, Susan Hough
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
