Relaxing the Separation Between On-Fault and Off-Fault Seismicity Using an Empirical Mw–Deformed Area Relation

Authors

  • Alessandro Valentini University of Vienna

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26443/seismica.v5i1.2179

Keywords:

probabilistic seismic hazard model, earthquake rupture forecast, distributed seismicity

Abstract

Integrating fault‐based and distributed seismicity in earthquake rupture forecasts (ERFs) is one of the challenges in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. Traditional approaches impose a sharp distinction between on-fault and off-fault earthquakes, even though real seismicity systematically violates this separation. Moreover, combining fault and distributed sources often introduces double counting in the overlapping magnitude range and produces discontinuities in spatial earthquake rates. Here we propose a physically motivated method to relax the boundary between fault and off-fault seismicity by exploiting an empirical relation between moment magnitude (Mw) and the areal extent of permanent ground deformation derived from interferometric synthetic aperture radar observations. Using a published global dataset of 96 earthquakes, we recompute log-linear regressions between Mw and deformed area for different faulting styles and use the resulting footprint as a deformation-based buffer around each modeled seismogenic structure. Within this buffer, distributed seismicity rates for magnitudes above the minimum magnitude of the fault source are reduced using a distance-dependent power-law taper and removed entirely for points lying within the surface projection of the fault. The method produces a smooth, physically interpretable transition between fault and off-fault activity, avoids double counting, and naturally accounts for overlapping influence zones of nearby faults. This deformation-based taper provides a reproducible and easily implementable framework for improving ERFs in regions where both fault sources and distributed seismicity contribute to the overall hazard.

References

Cornell, C. A. (1968). Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 58(5), 1583–1606. https://doi.org/10.1785/bssa0580051583

Cowie, P. A., Vanneste, C., & Sornette, D. (1993). Statistical physics model for the spatiotemporal evolution of faults. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 98(B12), 21809–21821. https://doi.org/10.1029/93jb02223

Field, E. H., Arrowsmith, R. J., Biasi, G. P., Bird, P., Dawson, T. E., Felzer, K. R., Jackson, D. D., Johnson, K. M., Jordan, T. H., Madden, C., Michael, A. J., Milner, K. R., Page, M. T., Parsons, T., Powers, P. M., Shaw, B. E., Thatcher, W. R., Weldon, R. J., & Zeng, Y. (2014). Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast, Version 3 (UCERF3)–The Time-Independent Model. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 104(3), 1122–1180. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120130164

Gerstenberger, M. C., Bora, S., Bradley, B. A., DiCaprio, C., Kaiser, A., Manea, E. F., Nicol, A., Rollins, C., Stirling, M. W., Thingbaijam, K. K. S., Van Dissen, R. J., Abbott, E. R., Atkinson, G. M., Chamberlain, C., Christophersen, A., Clark, K., Coffey, G. L., de la Torre, C. A., Ellis, S. M., … Wotherspoon, L. M. (2023). The 2022 Aotearoa New Zealand National Seismic Hazard Model: Process, Overview, and Results. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 114(1), 7–36. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120230182

Gómez-Novell, O., Chartier, T., García-Mayordomo, J., Ortuño, M., Masana, E., Insua-Arévalo, J. M., & Scotti, O. (2020). Modelling earthquake rupture rates in fault systems for seismic hazard assessment: The Eastern Betics Shear Zone. Engineering Geology, 265, 105452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105452

Gürpinar, A., Serva, L., Livio, F., & Rizzo, P. C. (2017). Earthquake-induced crustal deformation and consequences for fault displacement hazard analysis of nuclear power plants. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 311, 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2016.11.007

International Atomic Energy Agency. (2015). The Contribution of Palaeoseismology to Seismic Hazard Assessment in Site Evaluation for Nuclear Installations. TECDOC Series 1767, IAEA.

International Atomic Energy Agency. (2022). Seismic hazards in site evaluation for nuclear installations, Specific Safety Guides SSG‐9. International Atomic Energy Agency.

Leonard, M. (2010). Earthquake Fault Scaling: Self-Consistent Relating of Rupture Length, Width, Average Displacement, and Moment Release. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 100(5A), 1971–1988. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120090189

Livio, F., & Ferrario, M. F. (2024). Empirical relation among earthquake magnitude (Mw) and deformed area as imaged by InSAR [Dataset]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.11030647

Livio, F., Serva, L., & Gürpinar, A. (2017). Locating distributed faulting: Contributions from InSAR imaging to Probabilistic Fault Displacement Hazard Analysis (PFDHA). Quaternary International, 451, 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2016.09.034

McGuire, R. K. (1995). Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and design earthquakes: Closing the loop. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 85(5), 1275–1284. https://doi.org/10.1785/bssa0850051275

Meletti, C., Marzocchi, W., D’Amico, V., Lanzano, G., Luzi, L., Martinelli, F., Pace, B., Rovida, A., Taroni, M., Visini, F., Akinci, A., MPS Working Group: Anzidei, M., Avallone, A., Azzaro, R., Barani, S., Barberi, G., Barreca, G., Basili, R., Bird, P., … Zuccolo, E. (2021). The new Italian seismic hazard model (MPS19). Annals of Geophysics, 64(1), SE112. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-8579

Petersen, M. D., Shumway, A. M., Powers, P. M., Field, E. H., Moschetti, M. P., Jaiswal, K. S., Milner, K. R., Rezaeian, S., Frankel, A. D., Llenos, A. L., Michael, A. J., Altekruse, J. M., Ahdi, S. K., Withers, K. B., Mueller, C. S., Zeng, Y., Chase, R. E., Salditch, L. M., Luco, N., … Witter, R. C. (2024). The 2023 US 50‐State National Seismic Hazard Model: Overview and implications. Earthquake Spectra, 40(1), 5–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/87552930231215428

Serva, L., Livio, F. A., Bonadeo, L., & Colombo, M. (2025). The use of the area deformed by earthquakes (deformed area method) for potential fault capability assessment. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 444, 114380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2025.114380

Serva, L., Livio, F. A., & Gürpinar, A. (2019). Surface Faulting and Ground Deformation: Considerations on Their Lower Detectable Limit and on FDHA for Nuclear Installations. Earthquake Spectra, 35(4), 1821–1843. https://doi.org/10.1193/110718eqs253m

Stirling, M., McVerry, G., Gerstenberger, M., Litchfield, N., Van Dissen, R., Berryman, K., Barnes, P., Wallace, L., Villamor, P., Langridge, R., Lamarche, G., Nodder, S., Reyners, M., Bradley, B., Rhoades, D., Smith, W., Nicol, A., Pettinga, J., Clark, K., & Jacobs, K. (2012). National Seismic Hazard Model for New Zealand: 2010 Update. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 102(4), 1514–1542. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120110170

Stirling, M. W., Verry, G. H. M., & Berryman, K. R. (2002). A New Seismic Hazard Model for New Zealand. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 92(5), 1878–1903. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120010156

Thingbaijam, K. K. S., Martin Mai, P., & Goda, K. (2017). New Empirical Earthquake Source‐Scaling Laws. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 107(5), 2225–2246. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120170017 Valentini, A. (2020). Allowing multi-fault earthquakes and relaxing fault segmentation in Central Apennines (Italy): Hints for fault-based PSHA. Bulletin of Geophysics and Oceanography, 62(4), 647–688. https://doi.org/10.4430/bgta0339

Valentini, A., Visini, F., & Pace, B. (2017). Integrating faults and past earthquakes into a probabilistic seismic hazard model for peninsular Italy. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 17(11), 2017–2039. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-2017-2017

Walters, R. J., Elliott, J. R., D’Agostino, N., England, P. C., Hunstad, I., Jackson, J. A., Parsons, B., Phillips, R. J., & Roberts, G. (2009). The 2009 L’Aquila earthquake (central Italy): A source mechanism and implications for seismic hazard. Geophysical Research Letters, 36(17). https://doi.org/10.1029/2009gl039337

Wells, D. L., & Coppersmith, K. J. (1994). New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 84(4), 974–1002. https://doi.org/10.1785/bssa0840040974

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2026-04-24

How to Cite

Valentini, A. (2026). Relaxing the Separation Between On-Fault and Off-Fault Seismicity Using an Empirical Mw–Deformed Area Relation. Seismica, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.26443/seismica.v5i1.2179

Issue

Section

Articles

Funding data