Correcting exponentiality test for binned earthquake magnitudes

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26443/seismica.v5i1.2257

Keywords:

Statistical Seismology, magnitude of completeness, lilliefors test, exponential

Abstract

Above the magnitude of completeness - the minimum threshold for which a 100% detection rate is assumed - earthquake magnitudes are typically modeled as a continuous exponential distribution. In practice, however, earthquake catalogs report magnitudes with finite resolution, resulting in a discrete (geometric) distribution. To determine the magnitude of completeness, the Lilliefors test is commonly applied. Because this test assumes continuous data, it is standard practice to add uniform noise to binned magnitudes prior to testing exponentiality.
Here we show analytically that uniform dithering does not recover the underlying continuous exponential distribution from its discretized (geometric) form. It instead returns a piecewise-constant residual lifetime distribution, whose deviation from the exponential model becomes detectable as catalog size or bin width increases. Through numerical experiments, we demonstrate that this deviation yields a systematic overestimation of the magnitude of completeness, with biases exceeding one magnitude unit in large, high-resolution catalogs.
We derive the exact noise distribution - a truncated exponential within each magnitude bin - that correctly restores the continuous exponential distribution over the whole magnitude range. Numerical tests show that this correction yields Lilliefors rejection probabilities that are consistent with the significance level across a wide range of bin widths and catalog sizes. Although illustrated for the Lilliefors test, the identified bias and the proposed correction are independent of the specific statistical test and apply generally to exponentiality testing of discretized magnitude data.

References

Chamberlain, C. J., Hopp, C. J., Boese, C. M., Warren-Smith, E., Chambers, D., Chu, S. X., Michailos, K., & Townend, J. (2018). EQcorrscan: Repeating and near-repeating earthquake detection and analysis in Python. Seismological Research Letters, 89(1), 173–181. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220170151 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0220170151

Chattamvelli, R., & Shanmugam, R. (2020). Discrete Distributions in Engineering and the Applied Sciences. Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02425-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02425-2

Clauset, A., Shalizi, C. R., & Newman, M. E. J. (2009). Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Review, 51(4), 661–703. https://doi.org/10.1137/070710111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1137/070710111

Dokht, R. M. H., Kao, H., Visser, R., & Smith, B. (2019). Seismic event and phase detection using time-frequency representation and convolutional neural networks. Seismological Research Letters, 90(2A), 481–490. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180308 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180308

Feller, W. (1957). An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, Volume 2. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1137/1014119 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1137/1014119

Gibbons, S. J., & Ringdal, F. (2006). The detection of low magnitude seismic events using array-based waveform correlation. Geophysical Journal International, 165(1), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.02865.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.02865.x

Grimmett, G., & Stirzaker, D. (2001). Probability and random processes. OUP Oxford. https://books.google.it/books?id=G3ig-0M4wSIC DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198572237.001.0001

Gutenberg, B., & Richter, C. F. (1944). Frequency of earthquakes in California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 34(4), 185–188. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0340040185 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0340040185

Herrmann, M., & Marzocchi, W. (2020). Mc-Lilliefors: a completeness magnitude that complies with the exponential-like Gutenberg–Richter relation [Software]. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4162497

Herrmann, M., & Marzocchi, W. (2021). Inconsistencies and lurking pitfalls in the magnitude–frequency distribution of high-resolution earthquake catalogs. Seismological Research Letters, 92(2A), 909–922. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220200337 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0220200337

Lilliefors, H. W. (1967). On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Normality with Mean and Variance Unknown. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62(318), 399–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1967.10482916 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1967.10482916

Lilliefors, H. W. (1969). On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for the exponential distribution with mean unknown. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 64(325), 387–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1969.10500983 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1969.10500983

Lombardi, A. M. (2021). A normalized distance test for co-determining the completeness magnitude and b-value of earthquake catalogs. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 126(3), e2020JB021242. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JB021242 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JB021242

Mancini, S., Segou, M., Werner, M. J., Parsons, T., Beroza, G., & Chiaraluce, L. (2022). On the use of high-resolution and deep-learning seismic catalogs for short-term earthquake forecasts: Potential benefits and current limitations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 127(11), e2022JB025202. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JB025202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JB025202

Marzocchi, W., Spassiani, I., Stallone, A., & Taroni, M. (2019). How to be fooled searching for significant variations of the b-value. Geophysical Journal International, 220(3), 1845–1856. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggz541 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggz541

Massey, F. J. J. (1951). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for goodness of fit. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 46(253), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1951.10500769 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1951.10500769

Mignan, A., & Woessner, J. (2012). Theme IV - Understanding seismicity catalogs and their problems [Techreport]. Community Online Resource for Statistical Seismicity Analysis (CORSSA). https://doi.org/10.5078/corssa-00180805

Mousavi, M. S., Ellsworth, W. L., Zhu, W., Chuang, L. Y., & Beroza, G. C. (2020). Earthquake transformer-an attentive deep-learning model for simultaneous earthquake detection and phase picking. Nature Communications, 11(1), 3952. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17591-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17591-w

Patton, A. M., Pennington, C. N., Walter, W. R., & Trugman, D. T. (2025). Exploring Uncertainty in Moment Estimation for Small Earthquakes in Southern Nevada Using the Coda Envelope Method. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 115(3), 1308–1317. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120240120 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120240120

Ross, Z. E., Trugman, D. T., Hauksson, E., & Shearer, P. M. (2019). Searching for hidden earthquakes in Southern California. Science, 364(6442), 767–771. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw6888 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw6888

Shelly, D. R., Beroza, G. C., & Ide, S. (2007). Non-volcanic tremor and low-frequency earthquake swarms. Nature, 446(7133), 305–307. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05666 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05666

Spassiani, I., Taroni, M., Murru, M., & Falcone, G. (2023). Real time Gutenberg–Richter b-value estimation for an ongoing seismic sequence: an application to the 2022 marche offshore earthquake sequence (ML 5.7 central Italy). Geophysical Journal International, 234(2), 1326–1331. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggad134 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggad134

Stallone, A. (2025). Comparison of Stochastic and Enhanced Earthquake Detection Techniques in Mitigating Time-Varying Incompleteness. Seismological Research Letters, 96(5), 3097–3111. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220240247 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0220240247

Tan, Y. J., Waldhauser, F., Ellsworth, W. L., Zhang, M., Zhu, W., Michele, M., Chiaraluce, L., Beroza, G. C., & Segou, M. (2021). Machine-learning-based high-resolution earthquake catalog reveals how complex fault structures were activated during the 2016–2017 Central Italy sequence. The Seismic Record, 1(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1785/0320210001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0320210001

Tinti, S., & Mulargia, F. (1987). Confidence intervals of b-values for grouped magnitudes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 77(6), 2125–2134. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0770062125 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0770062125

Zhu, W., & Beroza, G. C. (2019). PhaseNet: A deep-neural-network-based seismic arrival-time picking method. Geophysical Journal International, 216(1), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggy423 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggy423

Downloads

Published

2026-02-26

How to Cite

Stallone, A., & Spassiani, I. (2026). Correcting exponentiality test for binned earthquake magnitudes. Seismica, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.26443/seismica.v5i1.2257

Issue

Section

Articles