SPDE-ETAS: Fast and accurate Bayesian inference for the spatio-temporal epidemic type aftershock sequence (ETAS) model

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26443/seismica.v5i2.2585

Abstract

The Epidemic-Type Aftershock Sequence model is a well-established point process framework for characterizing earthquake occurrences. Traditionally, ETAS parameters are estimated using maximum likelihood methods, where the background rate is smoothed by a Gaussian kernel density. More recently, a Bayesian formulation has been proposed, in which the background rate is modeled as a Gaussian Process prior, enabling a flexible semi-parametric estimation. However, this approach can become computationally demanding for large datasets due to the dense covariance structure of the Gaussian Process.
An alternative representation of the Gaussian Process is the Gaussian Markov Random Field, which offers a sparse precision matrix formulation that significantly reduces computational complexity. Building on this connection, we propose the Stochastic Partial Differential Equation ETAS model, where the Gaussian Process covariance matrix is replaced by a sparse precision matrix within a Log-Gaussian Cox Process framework. The precision matrix is constructed using the finite element method on a triangular mesh, and the log-prior of the Gaussian Markov Random Field is approximated via the Laplace approximation to accelerate computation.
The model is first validated on synthetic datasets to assess its accuracy and computational efficiency compared to the kernel-based and Gaussian Process epidemic-Type Aftershock Sequence approaches. It is then applied to the Italian earthquake catalog (1960–2025) to estimate the stationary background seismicity with its uncertainties, relevant for seismic hazard assessment.

References

Asayesh, B. M., Hainzl, S., & Zöller, G. (2023). Depth‐Dependent Aftershock Trigger Potential Revealed by 3D‐ETAS Modeling. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 128(6). https://doi.org/10.1029/2023jb026377

Asayesh, B. M., Hainzl, S., & Zöller, G. (2025). Improved Aftershock Forecasts Using Mainshock Information in the Framework of the ETAS Model. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 130(2). https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jb030287

Bañales, I., Nishikawa, T., Ito, Y., & Aguilar-Velázquez, M. J. (2026). Estimating Inhomogeneous Spatiotemporal Background Intensity Functions Using Graphical Dirichlet Processes. Mathematical Geosciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-026-10301-0

Banerjee, S., Carlin, B. P., & Gelfand, A. E. (2003). Hierarchical modeling and analysis for spatial data. Chapman. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003401728

Chiles, J.-P., & Delfiner, P. (2012). Geostatistics: modeling spatial uncertainty. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118136188

Console, R., & Murru, M. (2001). A simple and testable model for earthquake clustering. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 106(B5), 8699–8711. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jb900269

Cox, D. R. (1955). Some Statistical Methods Connected with Series of Events. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1955.tb00188.x

Cressie, N., & Johannesson, G. (2008). Fixed Rank Kriging for Very Large Spatial Data Sets. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 70(1), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2007.00633.x

D’Angelo, N., Adelfio, G., Abbruzzo, A., & Mateu, J. (2022). Inhomogeneous spatio-temporal point processes on linear networks for visitors’ stops data. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.1214/21-aoas1519

Dutilleul, P., Genest, C., & Peng, R. (2024). Bootstrapping for parameter uncertainty in the space–time epidemic-type aftershock sequence model. Geophysical Journal International, 236(3), 1601–1608. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggae003

Ebrahimian, H., Jalayer, F., Maleki Asayesh, B., Hainzl, S., & Zafarani, H. (2022). Improvements to seismicity forecasting based on a Bayesian spatio-temporal ETAS model. Scientific Reports, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-24080-1

Edelsbrunner, H. (2001). Geometry and Topology for Mesh Generation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511530067

Grimm, C., Hainzl, S., Käser, M., & Küchenhoff, H. (2022). Solving three major biases of the ETAS model to improve forecasts of the 2019 Ridgecrest sequence. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 36(8), 2133–2152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-022-02221-2

Grimm, C., Käser, M., Hainzl, S., Pagani, M., & Küchenhoff, H. (2021). Improving Earthquake Doublet Frequency Predictions by Modified Spatial Trigger Kernels in the Epidemic-Type Aftershock Sequence (ETAS) Model. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 112(1). https://doi.org/10.1785/0120210097

Guttorp, P., & Gneiting, T. (2006). Studies in the history of probability and statistics XLIX On the Matérn correlation family. Biometrika, 93(4), 989–995. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/93.4.989

Hainzl, S. (2021). ETAS-Approach Accounting for Short-Term Incompleteness of Earthquake Catalogs. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 112(1). https://doi.org/10.1785/0120210146

Hainzl, S., Kumazawa, T., & Ogata, Y. (2024). Aftershock forecasts based on incomplete earthquake catalogues: ETASI model application to the 2023 SE Türkiye earthquake sequence. Geophysical Journal International, 236(3), 1609–1620. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggae006

Hainzl, S., & Ogata, Y. (2005). Detecting fluid signals in seismicity data through statistical earthquake modeling. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 110(B5). https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jb003247

Hainzl, S., Zakharova, O., & Marsan, D. (2013). Impact of Aseismic Transients on the Estimation of Aftershock Productivity Parameters. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 103(3). https://doi.org/10.1785/0120120247

Hawkes, A. G. (1971). Spectra of some self-exciting and mutually exciting point processes. Biometrika, 58(1), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/58.1.83

Hawkes, A. G., & Oakes, D. (1974). A cluster process representation of a self-exciting process. Journal of Applied Probability, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.2307/3212693

Helmstetter, A., & Sornette, D. (2002). Subcritical and supercritical regimes in epidemic models of earthquake aftershocks. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 107(B10), ESE 10-1-ESE 10-21. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB001580

Henderson, R., Shimakura, S., & Gorst, D. (2002). Modeling spatial variation in leukemia survival data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97(460), 965–972. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214502388618753

Hjelle, Ø., & Dæhlen, M. (2006). Triangulations and applications. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-33261-8

Kagan, Y. Y. (2002). Aftershock Zone Scaling. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 92(2), 641–655. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120010172

Lindgren, F., Rue, H., & Lindström, J. (2011). An Explicit Link between Gaussian Fields and Gaussian Markov Random Fields: The Stochastic Partial Differential Equation Approach. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 73(4), 423–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2011.00777.x

Lolli, B., Randazzo, D., Vannucci, G., & Gasperini, P. (2020). The Homogenized Instrumental Seismic Catalog (HORUS) of Italy from 1960 to Present. Seismological Research Letters, 91(6). https://doi.org/10.1785/0220200148

Lombardi, A. M. (2015). Estimation of the parameters of ETAS models by Simulated Annealing. Scientific Reports, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep08417

Lombardi, A. M., Cocco, M., & Marzocchi, W. (2010). On the Increase of Background Seismicity Rate during the 1997-1998 Umbria-Marche, Central Italy, Sequence: Apparent Variation or Fluid-Driven Triggering? Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 100(3), 1138–1152. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120090077

Marsan, D., Prono, E., & Helmstetter, A. (2013). Monitoring Aseismic Forcing in Fault Zones Using Earthquake Time Series. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 103(1), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120110304

Meletti, C., Marzocchi, W., D’Amico, V., Lanzano, G., Luzi, L., Martinelli, F., Pace, B., Rovida, A., Taroni, M., Visini, F., & Group, M. W. (2019). The new Italian seismic hazard model (MPS19). Annals of Geophysics. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-8579

Molkenthin, C., Donner, C., Reich, S., Zöller, G., Hainzl, S., Holschneider, M., & Opper, M. (2022). GP-ETAS: semiparametric Bayesian inference for the spatio-temporal epidemic type aftershock sequence model. Statistics and Computing, 32(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-022-10085-3

Molkenthin, C., Zöller, G., Hainzl, S., & Holschneider, M. (2024). Bayesian Earthquake Forecasting Using Gaussian Process Modeling: GP-ETAS Applications. Seismological Research Letters, 95(6), 3532–3544. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220240170

Muir, J. B., & Ross, Z. E. (2023). A deep Gaussian process model for seismicity background rates. Geophysical Journal International, 234(1), 427–438. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggad074

Ogata, Y. (1998). Space-Time Point-Process Models for Earthquake Occurrences. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 50(2). https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1003403601725

Ogata, Y., Katsura, K., Tsuruoka, H., & Hirata, N. (2019). High-resolution 3D earthquake forecasting beneath the greater Tokyo area. Earth, Planets and Space, 71(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-019-1086-7

Ogata, Y., & Zhuang, J. (2006). Space–time ETAS models and an improved extension. Tectonophysics, 413(1–2), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2005.10.016

Omori, F. (1894). On the aftershocks of earthquakes. J. Coll. Sci, 7(2), 111–120.

Rasmussen, J. G. (2013). Bayesian Inference for Hawkes Processes. Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, 15(3), 623–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11009-011-9272-5

Ross, G. J. (2021). Bayesian Estimation of the ETAS Model for Earthquake Occurrences. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 111(3), 1473–1480. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120200198

Ross, G. J., & Kolev, A. A. (2022). Semiparametric Bayesian forecasting of SpatioTemporal earthquake occurrences. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.1214/21-aoas1554

Simpson, D., Illian, J. B., Lindgren, F., Sørbye, S. H., & Rue, H. (2016). Going off grid: computationally efficient inference for log-Gaussian Cox processes. Biometrika, 103(1), 49–70. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/asv064

Soriano‐Redondo, A., Jones‐Todd, C. M., Bearhop, S., Hilton, G. M., Lock, L., Stanbury, A., Votier, S. C., & Illian, J. B. (2019). Understanding species distribution in dynamic populations: a new approach using spatio‐temporal point process models. Ecography, 42(6), 1092–1102. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.03771

Stein, M. L. (1999). Interpolation of Spatial Data: Some Theory for Kriging. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1494-6

Taylor, B. M., Davies, T. M., Rowlingson, B. S., & Diggle, P. J. (2013). lgcp An R Package for Inference with Spatio-Temporal Log-Gaussian Cox Processes. Journal of Statistical Software, 52(4). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v052.i04

Utsu, T. (1961). A statistical study on the occurrence of aftershocks. Geophys. Mag., 30, 521–605.

Utsu, T. (1970). Aftershocks and earthquake statistics (1): Some parameters which characterize an aftershock sequence and their interrelations. Journal of the Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University. Series 7, Geophysics, 3(3), 129–195.

Veen, A., & Schoenberg, F. P. (2008). Estimation of Space–Time Branching Process Models in Seismology Using an EM–Type Algorithm. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103(482). https://doi.org/10.1198/016214508000000148

Werner, M. J., Helmstetter, A., Jackson, D. D., & Kagan, Y. Y. (2011). High-Resolution Long-Term and Short-Term Earthquake Forecasts for California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 101(4), 1630–1648. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120090340

Zhuang, J., Christophersen, A., Savage, M. K., Vere‐Jones, D., Ogata, Y., & Jackson, D. D. (2008). Differences between spontaneous and triggered earthquakes: Their influences on foreshock probabilities. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 113(B11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jb005579

Zhuang, J., Ogata, Y., & Vere-Jones, D. (2002). Stochastic Declustering of Space-Time Earthquake Occurrences. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97(458). https://doi.org/10.1198/016214502760046925

Zhuang, J., Ogata, Y., & Vere‐Jones, D. (2004). Analyzing earthquake clustering features by using stochastic reconstruction. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 109(B5). https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jb002879

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2026-08-07

How to Cite

Rahmani, S. T.-E., Zöller, G., Hainzl, S., & Maleki Asayesh, B. (2026). SPDE-ETAS: Fast and accurate Bayesian inference for the spatio-temporal epidemic type aftershock sequence (ETAS) model. Seismica, 5(2), 15. https://doi.org/10.26443/seismica.v5i2.2585

Issue

Section

Articles

Funding data