Pitter, patter, gurgle, burble: measuring the acoustics of rainfall using DAS in urban environments

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26443/seismica.v5i2.2713

Abstract

Accurate precipitation data is one of the key inputs for hydrological models, yet traditional ground-based rain gauges and remote sensing data often lack the necessary spatial coverage and/or resolution for local environmental applications. This study demonstrates the potential of distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) as a tool for rainfall detection and quantification with high spatiotemporal resolution. We evaluate data from two distinct fiber-optic deployments in Houston, Texas: a surface cable in a controlled environment at Rice University campus and a 12-km urban dark fiber array. Rain induces high-energy broadband noise in DAS data with a strong correlation between the precipitation rate and mean DAS energy, consistent with past studies using traditional seismic sensors. However, DAS sensitivity to rain is heavily influenced by several external factors, including burial conditions, deployment depth, cable coupling, and seasonal ground coverage. In complex urban environments, where the signal is coupled directly from surface impacts on utility infrastructure, fiber sensitivity appears to be limited to spatial domains where the cable resurfaces from the deep conduits. Ultimately, our study shows that DAS can serve as a scalable alternative to traditional seismic sensors for distributed rain gauging across urban networks after identifying network portions with environmental sensitivity.

References

Ajo-Franklin, J., Dou, S., Lindsey, N., Monga, I., Tracy, C., Robertson, M., Rodrı́guez Tribaldos, V., Ulrich, C., Freifeld, B., Daley, T., & others. (2019). Distributed acoustic sensing using dark fiber for near-surface characterization and broadband seismic event detection. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36675-8

Alfieri, L., Feyen, L., Dottori, F., & Bianchi, A. (2015). Ensemble flood risk assessment in Europe under high end climate scenarios. Global Environmental Change, 35, 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.004

Ashouri, H., Hsu, K.-L., Sorooshian, S., Braithwaite, D. K., Knapp, K. R., Cecil, L. D., Nelson, B. R., & Prat, O. P. (2015). PERSIANN-CDR: Daily precipitation climate data record from multisatellite observations for hydrological and climate studies. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 96(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-13-00068.1

Bakker, M., Legout, C., Gimbert, F., Nord, G., Boudevillain, B., & Freche, G. (2022). Seismic modelling and observations of rainfall. Journal of Hydrology, 610, 127812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127812

Behrangi, A., Khakbaz, B., Jaw, T. C., AghaKouchak, A., Hsu, K., & Sorooshian, S. (2011). Hydrologic evaluation of satellite precipitation products over a mid-size basin. Journal of Hydrology, 397(3–4), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.11.043

Beven, K., & Binley, A. (1992). The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. Hydrological Processes, 6(3), 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360060305

Beven, K. J. (2012). Rainfall-runoff modelling: the primer. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119951001

Brandt, J. (1988). The transformation of rainfall energy by a tropical rain forest canopy in relation to soil erosion. Journal of Biogeography, 41–48. https://doi.org/10.2307/2845044

Brenne, J. K., Sladen, A., Pecci, P., Morten, J. P., Pelaez, J., Jacobsen, J., Calsat, A., Plantady, P., Ampuero, J.-P., Rivet, D., & Février, H. (2024). Non-intrusive DAS coexisting in telecom networks. Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC) 2024, M4E.3. https://doi.org/10.1364/OFC.2024.M4E.3

Brittan, J., Pidsley, L., Cavalin, D., Ryder, A., & Turner, G. (2008). Optimizing the removal of seismic interference noise. The Leading Edge, 27(2), 166–175. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2840363

Burtin, A., Cattin, R., Bollinger, L., Vergne, J., Steer, P., Robert, A., Findling, N., & Tiberi, C. (2011). Towards the hydrologic and bed load monitoring from high-frequency seismic noise in a braided river: The “torrent de St Pierre”, French Alps. Journal of Hydrology, 408(1–2), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.07.014

Cheng, F., Lindsey, N. J., Sobolevskaia, V., Dou, S., Freifeld, B., Wood, T., James, S. R., Wagner, A. M., & Ajo-Franklin, J. B. (2022). Watching the cryosphere thaw: seismic monitoring of permafrost degradation using distributed acoustic sensing during a controlled heating experiment. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(10), e2021GL097195. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021gl097195

Chmiel, M., Godano, M., Piantini, M., Brigode, P., Gimbert, F., Bakker, M., Courboulex, F., Ampuero, J.-P., Rivet, D., Sladen, A., & others. (2022). Brief communication: Seismological analysis of flood dynamics and hydrologically triggered earthquake swarms associated with Storm Alex. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 22(5), 1541–1558. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1541-2022

Crum, T. D., & Alberty, R. L. (1993). The WSR-88D and the WSR-88D operational support facility. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 74(9), 1669–1688. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1993)074<1669:twatwo>2.0.co;2

Das, T., Bárdossy, A., Zehe, E., & He, Y. (2008). Comparison of conceptual model performance using different representations of spatial variability. Journal of Hydrology, 356(1–2), 106–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.04.008

Dean, T. (2017). The seismic signature of rain. Geophysics, 82(5), P53–P60. https://doi.org/10.1071/aseg2018abp068

Diaz, J., Ruiz, M., Udina, M., Polls, F., Martı́, D., & Bech, J. (2023). Monitoring storm evolution using a high-density seismic network. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 1853. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28902-8

Dickinson, E. (n.d.). Like rain it sounded till it curved. https://acdc.amherst.edu/view/EmilyDickinson/ed0275

Dı́az, J., Ruı́z, M., Crescentini, L., Amoruso, A., & Gallart, J. (2014). Seismic monitoring of an Alpine mountain river. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 119(4), 3276–3289. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014jb010955

Euser, T., Hrachowitz, M., Winsemius, H. C., & Savenije, H. H. (2015). The effect of forcing and landscape distribution on performance and consistency of model structures. Hydrological Processes, 29(17), 3727–3743. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10445

Federal Meteorological Handbook. (2005). Surface weather observations and reports. US Department of Commerce/National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 13.

Fornis, R. L., Vermeulen, H. R., & Nieuwenhuis, J. D. (2005). Kinetic energy–rainfall intensity relationship for Central Cebu, Philippines for soil erosion studies. Journal of Hydrology, 300(1–4), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.04.027

Funk, C., Peterson, P., Landsfeld, M., Pedreros, D., Verdin, J., Shukla, S., Husak, G., Rowland, J., Harrison, L., Hoell, A., & others. (2015). The climate hazards infrared precipitation with stations — a new environmental record for monitoring extremes. Scientific Data, 2(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2015.66

Gelaro, R., McCarty, W., Suárez, M. J., Todling, R., Molod, A., Takacs, L., Randles, C. A., Darmenov, A., Bosilovich, M. G., Reichle, R., & others. (2017). The modern-era retrospective analysis for research and applications, version 2 (MERRA-2). Journal of Climate, 30(14), 5419–5454. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-16-0758.1

Gimbert, F., Tsai, V. C., & Lamb, M. P. (2014). A physical model for seismic noise generation by turbulent flow in rivers. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 119(10), 2209–2238. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014jf003201

Guo, M., Jian, J., Zhao, Z., & Jiao, J. (2013). Measurement on physical parameters of raindrop energy. Springerplus, 2(Suppl 1), S16. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-s1-s16

Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Dahlgren, P., Horányi, A., Munoz-Sebater, J., Nicolas, J., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., & others. (2020). The ERA5 Global Reanalysis: achieving a detailed record of the climate and weather for the past 70 years. European Geophysical Union General Assembly, 3–8. https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-10375

Hirabayashi, Y., Mahendran, R., Koirala, S., Konoshima, L., Yamazaki, D., Watanabe, S., Kim, H., & Kanae, S. (2013). Global flood risk under climate change. Nature Climate Change, 3(9), 816–821. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1911

Hua, J., Wu, M., Mulholland, J. P., Neelin, J. D., Tsai, V. C., & Trugman, D. T. (2023). High-resolution precipitation monitoring with a dense seismic nodal array. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 11450. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38008-w

Jia, Z., Campos, L. A., Xu, M., Zhang, H., Gonzalez-Herraez, M., Martins, H. F., & Zhan, Z. (2021). Experimental coexistence investigation of distributed acoustic sensing and coherent communication systems. 2021 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1364/ofc.2021.th4f.4

Joyce, R. J., Janowiak, J. E., Arkin, P. A., & Xie, P. (2004). CMORPH: A method that produces global precipitation estimates from passive microwave and infrared data at high spatial and temporal resolution. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 5(3), 487–503. https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2004)005<0487:camtpg>2.0.co;2

Kidd, C., Becker, A., Huffman, G. J., Muller, C. L., Joe, P., Skofronick-Jackson, G., & Kirschbaum, D. B. (2017). So, how much of the Earth’s surface is covered by rain gauges? Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 98(1), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-14-00283.1

Lindsey, N. J., & Martin, E. R. (2021). Fiber-optic seismology. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 49, 309–336. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-072420-065213

Lindsey, N. J., Rademacher, H., & Ajo-Franklin, J. B. (2020). On the broadband instrument response of fiber-optic DAS arrays. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 125(2), e2019JB018145. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jb018145

Loritz, R., Hrachowitz, M., Neuper, M., & Zehe, E. (2020). The role and value of distributed precipitation data for hydrological models. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 2020, 1–38. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-147-2021

Menne, M. J., Durre, I., Vose, R. S., Gleason, B. E., & Houston, T. G. (2012). An overview of the global historical climatology network-daily database. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 29(7), 897–910. https://doi.org/10.1175/jtech-d-11-00103.1

New, M., Todd, M., Hulme, M., & Jones, P. (2001). Precipitation measurements and trends in the twentieth century. International Journal of Climatology: A Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 21(15), 1889–1922. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.680

Nørmark, E. (2011). Wind and rain induced noise on reflection seismic data. Near Surface 2011-17th EAGE European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, cp-253. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.20144485

Omar, G. M., Paturel, J.-E., Salles, C., Mahé, G., Jalludin, M., Satgé, F., Ismail Nour, M., & Hassan Hersi, A. (2024). Comparative study from ground-based rain gauges vs. rainfall products at different time steps in the southeast of the Republic of Djibouti. Proceedings of IAHS, 385, 59–64. https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-385-59-2024

Parliament and Council of European Union. (2017). Directive 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on the assessment and management of flood risks. Official Journal of the European Uniony.

Pavesi, L., Volpi, E., & Fiori, A. (2024). Flood risk assessment through large-scale modeling under uncertainty. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 24(12), 4507–4522. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-4507-2024

Rindraharisaona, E., Réchou, A., Fontaine, F., Barruol, G., Stamenoff, P., Boudevillain, B., Rigaud-Louise, F., & Delcher, E. (2022). Seismic signature of rain and wind inferred from seismic data. Earth and Space Science, 9(10), e2022EA002328. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022ea002328

Rodrı́guez Tribaldos, V., & Ajo-Franklin, J. B. (2021). Aquifer monitoring using ambient seismic noise recorded with distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) deployed on dark fiber. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 126(4), e2020JB021004. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020jb021004

Roth, D. L., Brodsky, E. E., Finnegan, N. J., Rickenmann, D., Turowski, J. M., & Badoux, A. (2016). Bed load sediment transport inferred from seismic signals near a river. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 121(4), 725–747. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015jf003782

Saltikoff, E., Haase, G., Delobbe, L., Gaussiat, N., Martet, M., Idziorek, D., Leijnse, H., Novák, P., Lukach, M., & Stephan, K. (2019). OPERA the radar project. Atmosphere, 10(6), 320. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10060320

Schmandt, B., Aster, R. C., Scherler, D., Tsai, V. C., & Karlstrom, K. (2013). Multiple fluvial processes detected by riverside seismic and infrasound monitoring of a controlled flood in the Grand Canyon. Geophysical Research Letters, 40(18), 4858–4863. https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50953

Shadoan, T. A., Ajo-Franklin, J. B., Guglielmi, Y., Wood, T., Robertson, M., Cook, P., Soom, F., Daley, T. M., Hopp, C., Rodrı́guez Tribaldos, V., & others. (2023). Active-source seismic imaging of fault re-activation and leakage: an injection experiment at the Mt Terri Rock Laboratory, Switzerland. Geophysical Research Letters, 50(23), e2023GL104080. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023gl104080

Shen, J., & Zhu, T. (2023). DAS with telecommunication fibre-optic cable in urban areas can record storm-induced seismic noise. Geophysical Journal International, 235(3), 2122–2136. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggad352

Shi, Q., Williams, E. F., Lipovsky, B. P., Denolle, M. A., Wilcock, W. S., Kelley, D. S., & Schoedl, K. (2025). Multiplexed distributed acoustic sensing offshore central Oregon. Seismological Research Letters, 96(2A), 784–800. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220240460

Sivapalan, M. (2003). Process complexity at hillslope scale, process simplicity at watershed scale: Is there a connection? EGS-AGU-EUG Joint Assembly, 7973. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5109

Sobolevskaia , V. (2026). Replication Data for: Pitter, patter, gurgle, burble: measuring the acoustics of rainfall using DAS in urban environments (Version V1). Harvard Dataverse. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/8VZJNR

Sobolevskaia, V., & Ajo-Franklin, J. (2025). Cross-well imaging using distributed acoustic sensing (DAS): A hydrogeophysics case study. Geophysics, 91(2). https://doi.org/10.1190/geo-2025-0280

Sobolevskaia, V., Ajo-Franklin, J., Cheng, F., Dou, S., Lindsey, N. J., & Wagner, A. (2024). Monitoring water level of a surficial aquifer using distributed acoustic sensing and ballistic surface waves. Water Resources Research, 60(8), e2023WR036172. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023wr036172

Su, F., Hong, Y., & Lettenmaier, D. P. (2008). Evaluation of TRMM Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA) and its utility in hydrologic prediction in the La Plata Basin. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 9(4), 622–640. https://doi.org/10.1175/2007jhm944.1

Taweesintananon, K., Landrø, M., Potter, J. R., Johansen, S. E., Rørstadbotnen, R. A., Bouffaut, L., Kriesell, H. J., Brenne, J. K., Haukanes, A., Schjelderup, O., & others. (2023). Distributed acoustic sensing of ocean-bottom seismo-acoustics and distant storms: A case study from Svalbard, Norway. Geophysics, 88(3), B135–B150. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2022-0435.1

van Loenhout, J., Below, R., McClean, D., & others. (2020). The human cost of disasters: an overview of the last 20 years (2000-2019). Technol Report. Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED) and United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR).

Vorogushyn, S., Bates, P. D., de Bruijn, K., Castellarin, A., Kreibich, H., Priest, S., Schröter, K., Bagli, S., Blöschl, G., Domeneghetti, A., & others. (2018). Evolutionary leap in large-scale flood risk assessment needed. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 5(2), e1266. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1266

Welch, P. (2003). The use of fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: A method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms. IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics, 15(2), 70–73. https://doi.org/10.1109/tau.1967.1161901

Wing, O. E., Bates, P. D., Smith, A. M., Sampson, C. C., Johnson, K. A., Fargione, J., & Morefield, P. (2018). Estimates of present and future flood risk in the conterminous United States. Environmental Research Letters, 13(3), 034023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaac65

Winsemius, H. C., Aerts, J. C., Van Beek, L. P., Bierkens, M. F., Bouwman, A., Jongman, B., Kwadijk, J. C., Ligtvoet, W., Lucas, P. L., Van Vuuren, D. P., & others. (2016). Global drivers of future river flood risk. Nature Climate Change, 6(4), 381–385. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2893

Wood, E. F., Sivapalan, M., Beven, K., & Band, L. (1988). Effects of spatial variability and scale with implications to hydrologic modeling. Journal of Hydrology, 102(1–4), 29–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(88)90090-x

World Meteorological Association. (2021). Water-related hazards dominate disasters in the past 50 years. Press Release Number: 23072021.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2026-08-28

How to Cite

Sobolevskaia, V., Ajo-Franklin, J., & Miranda, B. (2026). Pitter, patter, gurgle, burble: measuring the acoustics of rainfall using DAS in urban environments. Seismica, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.26443/seismica.v5i2.2713

Issue

Section

Articles