The need for open, transdisciplinary, and ethical science in seismology

Authors

  • Irina Dallo Swiss Seismological Service at ETH Zurich
  • Marcus Herrmann Università degli Studi di Napoli ‘Federico II’ https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2342-1970
  • Mariano Supino Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia
  • José A. Bayona School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol
  • Asim M. Khawaja GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences
  • Chiara Scaini National Institute of Oceanography and Applied Geophysics

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26443/seismica.v2i2.470

Keywords:

open science, transdisciplinarity, ethics, dynamic seismic risk, progressing science

Abstract

Reducing the seismic risk for societies requires a bridge between scientific knowledge and societal actions. In recent years, three subjects that facilitate this connection gained growing importance: open science, transdisciplinarity, and ethics. We outline their relevance in general and specifically at the example of `'dynamic seismic risk' as explored in a dedicated workshop. We argue that these reflections can be transferred to other research fields for improving their practical and societal relevance. We provide recommendations for scientists at all levels to make science more open, transdisciplinary, and ethical. Only with a transition can we, as scientists, address current societal challenges and increase societies' resilience to disasters.

References

AGU. (2017). The responsibilities and rights of scientists. Position statement. American Geophysical Union. https://www.agu.org/Share-and-Advocate/Share/Policymakers/Position-Statements/Rights-and-responsibilities-of-scientists

Alexander, D. E. (2018). L’Aquila, central Italy, and the “disaster cycle”, 2009-2017. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 28(4), 419–433. https://doi.org/10.1108/dpm-01-2018-0022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-01-2018-0022

ALLEA. (2013). Ethics education in science. ALL European Academies - Permanent Working Group on Science and Ethics. https://www.allea.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Statement_Ethics_Edu_web_final_2013_10_10.pd

Allen, R. M., & Melgar, D. (2019). Earthquake Early Warning: Advances, Scientific Challenges, and Societal Needs. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 47(1), 361–388. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-053018-060457 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-053018-060457

Bailo, D., Jeffery, K. G., Atakan, K., Trani, L., Paciello, R., Vinciarelli, V., Michalek, J., & Spinuso, A. (2022). Data integration and FAIR data management in Solid Earth Science. Annals of Geophysics, 65(2), DM210. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-8742 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-8742

Bayona, J. A., Savran, W. H., Iturrieta, P., Gerstenberger, M. C., Graham, K. M., Marzocchi, W., Schorlemmer, D., & Werner, M. J. (2023). Are Regionally Calibrated Seismicity Models More Informative than Global Models? Insights from California, New Zealand, and Italy. The Seismic Record, 3(2), 86–95. https://doi.org/10.1785/0320230006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0320230006

Bayona, J. A., Savran, W. H., Rhoades, D. A., & Werner, M. J. (2022). Prospective evaluation of multiplicative hybrid earthquake forecasting models in California. Geophysical Journal International, 229(3), 1736–1753. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggac018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggac018

Bridle, H., Vrieling, A., Cardillo, M., Araya, Y., & Hinojosa, L. (2013). Preparing for an interdisciplinary future: A perspective from early-career researchers. Futures, 53, 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2013.09.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2013.09.003

Calatrava, A., Asorey, H., Astalos, J., Azevedo, A., Benincasa, F., Blanquer, I., Bobak, M., Brasileiro, F., Codó, L., Cano, L., Esteban, B., Ferret, M., Handl, J., Kerzenmacher, T., Kozlov, V., Křenek, A., Martins, R., Pavesio, M., Rubio-Montero, A. J., & Sánchez-Ferrero, J. (2023). A survey of the European Open Science Cloud services for expanding the capacity and capabilities of multidisciplinary scientific applications. Computer Science Review, 49, 100571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2023.100571 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2023.100571

Carr, L. J. (1932). Disaster and the Sequence-Pattern Concept of Social Change. American Journal of Sociology, 38(2), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1086/216030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/216030

COAR, CoreTrustSeal, European University Association, Science Europe, & World Data System. (2021). Joint Position Statement on “Data Repository Selection - Criteria That Matter.” Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4649136

Comfort, L. K., Erkan, B. B., & Gulkan, P. (2023). Earthquake in Turkey exposes gap between seismic knowledge and action - but it is possible to prepare. https://theconversation.com/earthquake-in-turkey-exposes-gap-between-seismic-knowledge-and-action-but-it-is-possible-to-prepare-199379

Cremen, G., & Galasso, C. (2020). Earthquake early warning: Recent advances and perspectives. Earth-Science Reviews, 205, 103184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103184 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103184

Dallo, I. (2022). Understanding the communication of event-related earthquake information in a multi-hazard context to improve society’s resilience [Phdthesis, ETH Zurich]. https://doi.org/10.3929/ETHZ-B-000535657

Dallo, I., Corradini, M., Fallou, L., & Marti, M. (2022). How to fight misinformation about earthquakes? A Communication Guide. https://doi.org/10.3929/ETHZ-B-000530319

Dallo, I., Stauffacher, M., & Marti, M. (2022). Actionable and understandable? Evidence-based recommendations for the design of (multi-)hazard warning messages. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 74, 102917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102917 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102917

Dallo, Irina, & Herrmann, M. (2023). Supplement of “The need for open, transdisciplinary, and ethical science in seismology.” ETH Zurich. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000621044

Dañobeitia, J. J., Pouliquen, S., Johannessen, T., Basset, A., Cannat, M., Pfeil, B. G., M.I., F., Materia, P., Gourcuff, C., Magnifico, G., Delory1, E., Rio Fernandez, J., Rodero, I., Beranzoli, L., Nardello, I., Iudicone, D., Carval, T., Gonzalez Aranda, J. M., Petihakis, G., … Favali, P. (2020). Toward a Comprehensive and Integrated Strategy of the European Marine Research Infrastructures for Ocean Observations. Frontiers in Marine Science, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00180 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00180

de la Guardia, F. H., & Sturdy, J. (2019). Best Practices for Transparent, Reproducible, and Ethical Research [Techreport]. Inter-American Development Bank. https://doi.org/10.18235/0001564 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18235/0001564

Di Capua, G., & Peppoloni, S. (2021). First report on ethical implications of EPOS Services to Society. https://www.epos-eu.org/sites/default/files/2022-01/First%20report%20on%20ethical%20implications%20of%20EPOS%20Services%20to%20Society.pdf

Dryhurst, S., Luoni, G., Dallo, I., Freeman, A. L. J., & Marti, M. (2021). Designing & implementing the seismic portion of dynamic risk communication for long-term risks, variable short-term risks, early warnings. http://static.seismo.ethz.ch/rise/deliverables/Deliverable_5.3.pdf

EERI. (2013). Earthquake Engineering Research Institute [Webpage.]. https://learningfromearthquakes.org/2023-02-06-nurdagi-turkey

Erdik, M., Şeşetyan, K., Demircioğlu, M. B., Hancılar, U., & Zülfikar, C. (2011). Rapid earthquake loss assessment after damaging earthquakes. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 31(2), 247–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.03.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.03.009

Evers, K. (2001). Standards for ethics and responsibility in science. https://council.science/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/SCRES-Background.pdf

Fallou, L., Marti, M., Dallo, I., & Corradini, M. (2022). How to Fight Earthquake Misinformation: A Communication Guide. Seismological Research Letters, 93(5), 2418–2422. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220220086 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0220220086

Ferreira, R., Buttell, F., & Ferreira, S. (2015). Ethical considerations for conducting disaster research with vulnerable populations. Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics, 3, 379–384.

Flaherty, E., Sturm, T., & Farries, E. (2022). The conspiracy of Covid-19 and 5G: Spatial analysis fallacies in the age of data democratization. Social Science & Medicine, 293, 114546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114546 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114546

Folch, A., Abril, C., Afanasiev, M., Amati, G., Bader, M., Badia, R. M., Bayraktar, H. B., Barsotti, S., Basili, R., Bernardi, F., Boehm, C., Brizuela, B., Brogi, F., Cabrera, E., Casarotti, E., Castro, M. J., Cerminara, M., Cirella, A., Cheptsov, A., … Wössner, U. (2023). The EU Center of Excellence for Exascale in Solid Earth (ChEESE): Implementation, results, and roadmap for the second phase. Future Generation Computer Systems, 146, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2023.04.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2023.04.006

Freeman, A. L. J., Dryhurst, S., & Luoni, G. (2023). Good practice recommendations: Earthquake forecast communication [Webpage.]. http://rise-eu.org/dissemination/good-practices/oef-communication

GDACS. (2023). Global Disaster Alert and Coordination System. https://www.gdacs.org/report.aspx?eventid=1357372&episodeid=1487096&eventtype=EQ

GSLN. (2023). Geohazard Supersites and Natural Laboratories [Webpage.]. https://geo-gsnl.org/supersites/event-supersites/active-event-supersites/kahramanmaras-event-supersite

Haslinger, F., Basili, R., Bossu, R., Cauzzi, C., Cotton, F., Crowley, H., Custodio, S., Danciu, L., Locati, M., Michelini, A., Molinari, I., Ottemöller, L., & Parolai, S. (2022). Coordinated and Interoperable Seismological Data and Product Services in Europe: the EPOS Thematic Core Service for Seismology. Annals of Geophysics, 65(2), DM213. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-8767 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-8767

Haven, T., Bouter, L., Mennen, L., & Tijdink, J. (2022). Superb supervision: A pilot study on training supervisors to convey responsible research practices onto their PhD candidates. Accountability in Research, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2022.2071153 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2022.2071153

Heise, V., Holman, C., Lo, H., Lyras, E. M., Adkins, M. C., Aquino, M. R. J., Bougioukas, K. I., Bray, K. O., Gajos, M., Guo, X., Hartling, C., Huerta-Gutierrez, R., Jindrová, M., Kenney, J. P. M., Kępińska, A. P., Kneller, L., Lopez-Rodriguez, E., Mühlensiepen, F., Richards, A., … Weissgerber, T. L. (2023). Ten simple rules for implementing open and reproducible research practices after attending a training course. PLOS Computational Biology, 19(1), e1010750. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010750 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010750

Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015). Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520(7548), 429–431. https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a

Hirsch Hadorn, G., Hoffmann-Riem, H., Biber-Klemm, S., Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W., Joye, D., Pohl, C., Wiesmann, U., & Zemp, E. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of transdisciplinary research. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6699-3

Hussain, E., Kalaycıoğlu, S., Milliner, C. W., & Çakir, Z. (2023). Preconditioning the 2023 Kahramanmaraş (Türkiye) earthquake disaster. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 4(5), 287–289. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-023-00411-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-023-00411-2

Jordan, T. H., Chen, Y.-T., Gasparini, P., Madariaga, R., Main, I., Marzocchi, W., Papadopoulos, G., Sobolev, G., Yamaoka, K., & Zschau, J. (2011). Operational Earthquake Forecasting: State of knowledge and guidelines for implementation. Annals of Geophysics, 54(4). https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-5350 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-5350

Khawaja, A. M., Hainzl, S., Schorlemmer, D., Iturrieta, P., Bayona, J. A., Savran, W. H., Werner, M., & Marzocchi, W. (2023). Statistical power of spatial earthquake forecast tests. Geophysical Journal International, 233(3), 2053–2066. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggad030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggad030

Klinkhamer, L. (2022). Equity, diversity and inclusivity in open research. BMJ Open Science. https://blogs.bmj.com/openscience/2022/04/27/equity-diversity-and-inclusivity-in-open-research/

Leonelli, S. (2023). Philosophy of open science (Preprint). https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/21986 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009416368

Louis-Charles, H. M., Howard, R., Remy, L., Nibbs, F., & Turner, G. (2020). Ethical Considerations for Postdisaster Fieldwork and Data Collection in the Caribbean. American Behavioral Scientist, 64(8), 1129–1144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764220938113 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764220938113

Marti, M., Dallo, I., Roth, P., Papadopoulos, A. N., & Zaugg, S. (2023). Illustrating the impact of earthquakes: Evidence-based and user-centered recommendations on how to design earthquake scenarios and rapid impact assessments. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 90, 103674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103674 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103674

Marti, M., Haslinger, F., Peppoloni, S., Capua, G. D., Glaves, H., & Dallo, I. (2022). Addressing the challenges of making data, products, and services accessible: An EPOS perspective. Annals of Geophysics, 65(2), DM212. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-8746 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-8746

Merow, C., Boyle, B., Enquist, B. J., Feng, X., Kass, J. M., Maitner, B. S., McGill, B., Owens, H., Park, D. S., Paz, A., Pinilla-Buitrago, G. E., Urban, M. C., Varela, S., & Wilson, A. M. (2023). Better incentives are needed to reward academic software development. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 7(5), 626–627. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02008-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02008-w

Mezinska, S., Kakuk, P., Mijaljica, G., Waligóra, M., & O’Mathúna, D. P. (2016). Research in disaster settings: a systematic qualitative review of ethical guidelines. BMC Medical Ethics, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0148-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0148-7

Miles, S. B., & Chang, S. E. (2006). Modeling Community Recovery from Earthquakes. Earthquake Spectra, 22(2), 439–458. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2192847 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2192847

Müller, R., & Kaltenbrunner, W. (2019). Re-disciplining Academic Careers? Interdisciplinary Practice and Career Development in a Swedish Environmental Sciences Research Center. Minerva, 57(4), 479–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-019-09373-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-019-09373-6

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2018). Open Science by Design: Realizing a Vision for 21st Century Research. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25116 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17226/25116

Nature. (2023). PhD training is no longer fit for purpose—It needs reform now. Nature, 613(7944), 414–414. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00084-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00084-3

Orlacchio, M., Chioccarelli, E., Baltzopoulos, G., & Iervolino, I. (2021). State-Dependent Seismic Fragility Functions for Italian Reinforced Concrete Structures: Preliminary Results. Proceedings of the 31st European Safety and Reliability Conference (ESREL 2021). https://doi.org/10.3850/978-981-18-2016-8_660-cd DOI: https://doi.org/10.3850/978-981-18-2016-8_660-cd

Orru, K., Klaos, M., Nero, K., Gabel, F., Hansson, S., & Nævestad, T.-O. (2022). Imagining and assessing future risks: A dynamic scenario-based social vulnerability analysis framework for disaster planning and response. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12436 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12436

Panjwani, A. (2023). False social media posts are hindering earthquake relief efforts in Turkey. You can help stop that. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/feb/14/turkey-syria-earthquake-misinformation-relief-efforts-turkey

Pärli, R., Stauffacher, M., Seigo, S. L., Probst, M., & Pearce, B. (2022). Designing interventions for sustainable change in a real-world laboratory. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02659-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02659-y

Paskin, N. (2010). Digital object identifier (DOI®) system. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences, 3, 1586–1592. https://doi.org/10.1081/E-ELIS3-120044418 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1081/E-ELIS3-120044418

Peek, L., Tobin, J., Adams, R. M., Wu, H., & Mathews, M. C. (2020). A Framework for Convergence Research in the Hazards and Disaster Field: The Natural Hazards Engineering Research Infrastructure CONVERGE Facility. Frontiers in Built Environment, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2020.00110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2020.00110

Pittore, M., Wieland, M., & Fleming, K. (2016). Perspectives on global dynamic exposure modelling for geo-risk assessment. Natural Hazards, 86(S1), 7–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2437-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2437-3

Pohl, C. (2020). Soft systems methodology. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3717356

Pohl, C., Klein, J. T., Hoffmann, S., Mitchell, C., & Fam, D. (2021). Conceptualising transdisciplinary integration as a multidimensional interactive process. Environmental Science & Policy, 118, 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.12.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.12.005

Pourret, O. (2022). Stop paying to be published Open Access – a French perspective. European Science Editing, 48. https://doi.org/10.3897/ese.2022.e90113 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/ese.2022.e90113

Provost, L., Donato, F., Tóth-Czifra, E., Dumouchel, S., Blotière, E., & Chen, Y. (2023). Open Science Training in TRIPLE. Open Research Europe, 3, 39. https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.15430.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.15430.2

Raška, P. (2022). On Epistemic Dissonance: Contesting the Transdisciplinary Disaster Risk Reduction Education, Research, and Practices. Frontiers in Earth Science, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.818361 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.818361

Rowe, C., Agius, M., Convers, J., Funning, G., Galasso, C., Hicks, S., Huynh, T., Lange, J., Lecocq, T., Mark, H., Ragon, T., Rychert, C., Teplitzky, S., Den Ende, M., & Okuwaki, R. (2022). The launch of Seismica: A seismic shift in publishing. Seismica, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.26443/seismica.v1i1.255 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26443/seismica.v1i1.255

Ryan-Davis, J., & Scalice, D. (2022). Co-Creating Ethical Practices and Approaches for Fieldwork. AGU Advances, 3(6). https://doi.org/10.1029/2022av000762 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2022AV000762

Sample, I. (2012). Harvard University says it can’t afford journal publishers’ prices. The Guardian, 24(1), 20–32.

Savran, W. H., Bayona, J. A., Iturrieta, P., Asim, K. M., Bao, H., Bayliss, K., Herrmann, M., Schorlemmer, D., Maechling, P. J., & Werner, M. J. (2022). pyCSEP: A Python Toolkit for Earthquake Forecast Developers. Seismological Research Letters, 93(5), 2858–2870. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220220033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0220220033

Savran, W., Werner, M., Schorlemmer, D., & Maechling, P. (2022). pyCSEP: A Python Toolkit For Earthquake Forecast Developers. Journal of Open Source Software, 7(69), 3658. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03658 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03658

Schorlemmer, D., Beutin, T., Cotton, F., Ospina, N. G., Hirata, N., Ma, K.-F., Nievas, C., Prehn, K., & Wyss, M. (2020). Global Dynamic Exposure and the OpenBuildingMap - A Big-Data and Crowd-Sourcing Approach to Exposure Modeling. https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-18920 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-18920

Schymanski, E. L., & Schymanski, S. J. (2023). Water science must be Open Science. Nature Water, 1(1), 4–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-022-00014-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-022-00014-z

Stablein, M. J., Gonzalez Cruz, J., Fidan, E. N., Talbot, J., Reed, S. P., Walters, R. S., Ogunyiola, A. J., Fernández Frey, M., Ramirez, M., Rosado Casanova, B., Heemstra, J., Marshall, A., & Rodríguez, L. F. (2022). Compound[ing] disasters in Puerto Rico: Pathways for virtual transdisciplinary collaboration to enhance community resilience. Global Environmental Change, 76, 102558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102558 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102558

Toomey, A. H. (2016). What happens at the gap between knowledge and practice? Spaces of encounter and misencounter between environmental scientists and local people. Ecology and Society, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.5751/es-08409-210228 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08409-210228

UNDRR. (2022a). Prospects and challenges of transdisciplinary research approaches for managing and communicating climate-related risks. In United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR). https://www.undrr.org/quick/71749

UNDRR. (2022b). Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2022: Our World at Risk: Transforming Governance for a Resilient Future. United Nations. https://doi.org/10.18356/9789210015059 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18356/9789210015059

UNESCO. (2022). Open Science. https://www.unesco.org/en/natural-sciences/open-science

Vienni Baptista, B., Fletcher, I., Maryl, M., Wciślik, P., Buchner, A., Lyall, C., Spaapen, J., & Pohl, C. (2020). Final report on understandings of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research and factors of success and failure (SHAPE-ID) [[Deliverable]. ETH Zurich.]. https://zenodo.org/record/3824839

Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, Ij. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., da Silva Santos, L. B., Bourne, P. E., Bouwman, J., Brookes, A. J., Clark, T., Crosas, M., Dillo, I., Dumon, O., Edmunds, S., Evelo, C. T., Finkers, R., … Mons, B. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18

Additional Files

Published

2023-08-01

How to Cite

Dallo, I., Herrmann, M., Supino, M., Bayona, J. A., Khawaja, A. M., & Scaini, C. (2023). The need for open, transdisciplinary, and ethical science in seismology. Seismica, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.26443/seismica.v2i2.470

Issue

Section

Opinion

Funding data